C05 - Modeling of mass variations down to small scales
The performance of new sensors and system configurations opens an extended new field of applications. Now also small-scale mass variations in the Earth system might be observed. In this project we study how big mass variations of different origin (e.g. atmosphere, non-tidal and hydrology) are and how much they affect the various gravity field quantities observed by new sensors.
In order to separate different signals, we are using the approach from Farrell (1972) to calculate changes in gravity from modeled mass variations. These models have high spatial and temporal resolution. For example, the input for non-tidal ocean loading is the coastDat2 data created by the Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht. It covers the North Sea, Baltic Sea and the northern Atlantic. Figure 01 shows water height variations during the 2008 storm ‘Emma’. Due to this storm, gravity in Hannover was changed by 14 nm/s2.
In Fennoscandia much of the time-variable gravity signal is dominated by hydrology (seasonal signal) and post-glacial rebound (PGR) (trend signal). In order to separate these two distinct signal types, seasonal and trend adjustment using locally weighted regression (STL) is used. It is a non-parametric method that applies two different moving windows, one for the seasonal signal and the other for the trend, to estimate the two signals without the signals leaking into each other. This method handles non-stationary signals and captures changes in trend and seasonal behavior.
The project also addresses the problem of de-aliasing of satellite gravity data, i.e. the reduction of high-frequency mass variations during data processing. In order to get a first-hand feeling of aliasing problems and de-aliasing strategies, we are studying ocean-tide aliasing. We use noise-free simulated data, where only the static gravity field and ocean-tide models are used. This is done to quantify the upper bound of the ocean-tide aliasing error.
One of the promising strategies for reducing the aliasing errors is the Wiese approach. In general, only monthly estimates of the time-variable gravity field are computed, but in the Wiese approach, low-degree (long wavelength) sub-monthly (usually daily or two-day) solutions are co-parameterized. Since ocean-tides have higher frequencies (diurnal and semi-diurnal) than the sub-monthly solutions, Wiese approach does not mitigate ocean-tides. However, it allows for retrieving the long wavelength ocean-tide aliasing signal as shown in figure 04.
Scientists working on this project
Dr. Balaji Devaraju
phone: +49 511 762-17693
phone: +49 511 762-17693
Dr. Akbar Shabanloui
phone: +49 511 762-5149
Shabanloui A. and Müller J. (2016):
Mass variations in the Siberian permafrost region based on new GRACE results and auxiliary modeling, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, pp. 1–8.
Vishwakarma B. D., Devaraju B. and Sneeuw N. (2016):
Minimizing the effects of filtering on catchment scale GRACE solutions, Water Resour. Res., 52, 5868–5890
Francis O., Baumann H., Ullrich C., Castelein S., Van Camp M., de Sousa M.A., Melhorato R.L., Li C., Xu J., Su D., Wu S., Hu H., Wu K., Li G., Li Z., Hsieh W.-C., Pálinkás V., Kostelecký J., Mäkinen J., Näränen J., Merlet S., Pereira Dos Santos F., Gillot P., Hinderer J., Bernard J.-D., Le Moigne N., Fores B., Gitlein O., Schilling M., Falk R., Wilmes H., Germak A., Biolcati E., Origlia C., Iacovone D., Baccaro F., Mizushima S., De Plaen R., Klein G., Seil M., Radinovic R., Sekowski M., Dykowski P., Choi I.-M., Kim M.-S., Borreguero A., Sainz-Maza S., Calvo M., Engfeldt A., Agren J., Reudink R., Eckl M., van Westrum D., Billson R. and Ellis B. (2015):
CCM.G-K2 key comparison, Metrologia Vol. 52 (1A), pp. 07009
Schilling M. and Gitlein O. (2015):
Accuracy Estimation of the IfE Gravimeters Micro-g LaCoste gPhone-98 and ZLS Burris Gravity Meter B-64, Proceedings of the IAG Scientific Assembly,01.-06.09.2013, Potsdam; International Association of Geodesy Symposia Vol. 143, pp. 249-256, Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Non Peer-Reviewed Literature
Schilling M. and Gitlein O. (2015): Schwereregistrierungen mit dem Micro-g LaCoste gPhone-98 und dem ZLS Burris Gravity Meter B-64, Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten Vol. 122 (05), S. 176-183
Presentations, Talks and Posters
Devaraju B. and Müller J. (2016): Quantifying tidal aliasing errors in the localized analysis of satellite tracking data, Geophysical Research Abstracts, EGU2016-4916 more
Leßmann L., Gitlein O. and Müller J. (2015): Gravity effects from non-tidal water mass changes in the Baltic Sea, 26th IUGG General Assembly, Prague, Czech Republic, 22 June – 02 July, 2015
Weigelt M., van Dam T., Jäggi A., Prange L., Tourian M.J., Keller W. and Sneeuw N. (2013):
Time-variable gravity signal in Greenland revealed by high-low satellite-to-satellite tracking, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118, pp. 3848–3859